The WHO’s actions during the COVID-19 scandal, driven by corporate interests, have led to an unprecedented assault on individual liberties and societal well-being. Individualized treatment was ditched for a one-size-fits all set of public health mandates that exacerbated human suffering. However, merely ending a relationship with WHO does not do anyone justice. A sovereign United States must go to war with the World Health Organization and fight back against an insidious global health industry and biosecurity state that thrives on power, profit and human exploitation.

Dismantling the WHO is just the beginning; we must confront the biosecurity state in domestic healthcare systems

While disentangling from the WHO may feel like a victory, it is a hollow one unless it is part of a broader overhaul of the entire global public health infrastructure that thrives on hysteria, fraud and unlawful mandates. The WHO is but a cog in a machine that values corporate profits and political control over the health and dignity of ordinary people. It is a tool of biosecurity agendas and profit-driven policies. Simply leaving the WHO will not end this toxic system. This toxic system of human exploitation is embedded into Western healthcare. We need to break away from predatory vaccine experimentation and infectious disease fearmongering, and find an exit strategy from the entire corrupt public health industry.

In 2020, the WHO didn’t just fail the world — it became an active participant facilitating medical fraud, medical error and wrongful death. At the behest of wealthy sponsors and political elites, the organization oversaw policies that disproportionately affected the most vulnerable populations. The behemoth pushed for lockdowns that decimated economies, exacerbated poverty and pushed millions more into food insecurity. The WHO’s reckless actions forced children out of school, denied medical care to those with non-COVID-related ailments and deepened the debt crises of developing nations. Perhaps most egregiously, the organization facilitated an unconscionable transfer of wealth from the most disadvantaged to the pharmaceutical and corporate elites.

This wasn’t an unfortunate mistake — it was a calculated, intentional response to a manufactured crisis. Instead of focusing on protecting the most vulnerable, the WHO facilitated a global power grab, censoring dissent and offering unprecedented privileges to its corporate sponsors. Fostering a climate of fear and control, the WHO set the stage for future exploitation. The result? A generation of young people with stolen opportunities, impoverished nations saddled with insurmountable debt, billions of dollars in profit funneled to pharmaceutical giants and a holocaust ignored.

The WHO’s failure isn’t just a case of poor leadership or bad decisions — it’s a reflection of deep-rooted structural corruption. The organization’s original mission, established in 1946, was to ensure health equity and protect the world’s most vulnerable. But over time, it has become a grotesque shadow of that ideal. Its executives, insulated by lavish salaries and funded by the very corporations it claims to regulate, are increasingly detached from the people they were supposed to serve. This corruption is not incidental — it is intrinsic to the WHO’s very existence.

Davos elite will continue to threaten human freedom and health, while pretending to keep people safe

It is a tragic farce to watch WHO leaders attend elite summits in Davos while millions around the world suffer from the totalitarian policies they impose. These elites are not working for the global population — they are working for the interests of multinational corporations, international finance and the political elites who profit from a system of global control.

Take, for example, the WHO’s recent push to amend the International Health Regulations (IHR) under the guise of pandemic preparedness. These amendments, championed by corporate interests and political elites, would give the WHO even more sweeping powers to dictate national health policies during future crises. The WHO, once a facilitator of global health equity, has become an instrument for a biosecurity agenda that prioritizes global control and private profits over the health and freedom of individuals.

The WHO’s hand is forced by the pharmaceutical industry and the wealthy figures who look to capitalize from vaccine investments. The more money these companies pump into the organization, the more influence they wield over its policies. And the results are devastating. The WHO’s advisory guidelines on things like abortion, gender identity, vaccine skepticism and climate change reflect this unholy alliance. Its push for universal abortion access up until birth, no questions asked, and its endorsement of extreme gender ideology, show a stunning disregard for biological truth and basic human dignity.

The WHO is merely one part of a much larger, systemic problem. The global health industry, in which the WHO plays a pivotal role, is increasingly dominated by a commodity-based approach that uses healthcare as a weapon. Market exclusivity and other profit motives restrict access to healthcare. A corrupt insurance industry eliminates alternative, holistic and individualized approaches to healthcare and stops the progression of healing modalities from being accepted. From Big Pharma to the private donors funding international health initiatives, this industry is driven by the bottom line — whether that means selling dangerous vaccines, controlling supply chains or pushing austerity measures on poor nations. To reform healthcare and restore trust in medical professionals, WHO must be dismantled and its sordid influences must be removed from every healthcare systems.

Sources include:

• Expose-News.com
• NaturalNews.com
• Open.who.int
• Brownstone.org

If the brave and the bold had not steadfastly resisted the propaganda and the totalitarianism, then the world would be in a much different place today – oppressed by vaccine passports, endless booster requirements, slavery and death. Without the growing health freedom movement, populations would be subject to the constant threat of societal segregation, loss of parental rights, censorship, intimidation and discrimination in the workplace, and intellectual suicide. In fact, America could very easily be dealing with quarantine camps if it weren’t for widespread awareness and resistance to the medical tyranny.

Quarantine camps were originally planned for U.S. communities

As medical tyranny was placated in the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) rolled out a series of totalitarian policies that fundamentally altered daily life, ranging from insidious mask mandates, social distancing insanity to discriminatory business closures, travel restrictions, plexiglass barriers and societal segregation for those who did not submit to deadly medical experiments.

However, these measures, which were already draconian in their impact, were only a fraction of what was originally planned. An ignored CDC document reveals that a far more extreme and authoritarian approach was in the works — one that would have involved widespread isolation of individuals who were deemed “high-risk” in government-controlled quarantine camps. These quarantine camps were to be erected out of existing communities. People’s homes and property rights were to be seized, as families were set to be separated and cordoned off in different homes in the community.

In July 2020, the CDC quietly released the plan titled, “Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings.” This document, which remained on the CDC’s public website until March 2023, outlined a disturbing proposal to create nationwide isolation camps for individuals deemed “vulnerable.” This plan would have seen people forcibly separated from their families, their communities and even their religious practices, all in the name of “public health and safety.”

The plan — never fully implemented but disturbingly detailed — called for the forced relocation of “high-risk” individuals to what were effectively quarantine zones, under the CDC’s concept of “shielding.” These “green zones,” as the document described them, would isolate older adults and people with serious underlying health conditions, physically separating them from the general population to prevent them from coming into contact with individuals who were deemed “low-risk.”

The CDC’s proposal was not limited to households but extended to entire neighborhoods and even camps or sectors, which would have been scattered across the country. These camps were to house up to 50 high-risk individuals per zone, with strict controls over movement and a single-entry point for food and supplies. The plan even discussed the need for dedicated staff to monitor these zones and ensure that individuals adhered to strict isolation protocols.

Architects behind quarantine camps must be exposed

While the CDC stressed that the “shielding approach” was not meant to be coercive, it quickly acknowledged the inherent psychological dangers of such isolation. The document warned that being cut off from family, faith and community could lead to emotional distress, depression and even suicide among those confined in the zones. In fact, the CDC outlined procedures for preventing suicides and ensuring that the mentally ill in isolation were assigned caregivers to avoid neglect and abuse.

Perhaps most shockingly, the document included no provisions for legal appeals or any form of due process for those who were deemed “high-risk.” There was no mention of legal counsel or any recourse for individuals who disagreed with being forcibly removed from their homes or communities. The plan essentially outlined how individuals could be imprisoned without trial or representation under the guise of protecting them from a virus.

The document’s language is chilling, with deranged government officials assuming absolute control over individuals’ movements, families and rights. It suggests a system where the government could decide who lives and who is isolated based on public health determinations. This raises profound ethical questions about the role of government in dictating personal lives, as well as the capacity for abuse when such powers are unchecked.

The CDC’s quarantine camp plan, had it succeeded, would have been the ultimate realization of a medical police state. The removal of this plan from public view in 2023 does not erase the truth of its existence, the planning behind it, or the chilling implications of what could have been. Full disclosure of these maniacal plans must be made available to the public, and the architects must be publicly shamed, so that this never comes close to happening again.

Sources include:

• Brownstone.org
• Web.archive.org
• AHRP.org